Superior Court Judge John Deitch, whose sluggishness has made him the focus of election watchers across
the state, is moving quickly to settle outstanding election
challenges in Roselle and Hillside in advance of the September 20
deadline to begin mailing vote-by-mail ballots for the general
election.
Earlier this week, Deitch threw out the results of a Democratic primary
for Roselle Borough Council, stating that a two-vote victory by
incumbent Denise Wilkerson over Cynthia Johnson wouldn’t stand if
it were found that at least three voters were disenfranchised by
poll workers who didn’t understand the procedures.
The veteran judge, new to election matters, held a case
management conference on Thursday and will have a hearing this
afternoon to decide the fate of the election. He promised a
speedy decision.
“I think this needs to be brought to a head,” Deitch said. “I
would anticipate that I’ll give you my decision at the end of
argument, or certainly within a very, very short period of time
after argument.”
Union County Counsel Bruce Bergen has proposed a do-over primary
on December 9 — initially misstated in court yesterday
morning as December 10– with a special election on Tuesday, January
27. Both dates, Bergen said, coincide with special school
elections in other municipalities within the county.
“Because there are already elections taking place on those days,
it makes the process much easier, that they don’t have to program
the election booths more than once,” he told Deitch at a case
management conference. “The paperwork is easier. So that’s
why (the county clerk) chose dates.”
Those dates could be problematic – and muddy.
New Jersey election law requires vote-by-mail ballots to be
mailed 45 days before the primary election. Ballots going in
the mail on October 25, before the November 4 general election,
could confuse voters.
Potentially worse is that the deadline to commence mailing VBMs
for the January 27 general election is Saturday, December 13.
That’s before the legal deadline for late-arriving, properly
postmarked mail-in ballots to arrive at the Union County Board of
Elections. And it doesn’t take into consideration the
time it will take to design and print the ballots, unless Deitch
orders them to print two sets of ballots: one for Wilkerson and
another for Johnson.
Late-arriving vote-by-mail ballots have until six days after the
primary, and the election could be certified within a week, as long
as the cure letter deadline to repair technical deficiencies in
VBMs is appropriately adjusted.
Deitch will also need to decide if the election plan will permit
six days of early voting, which state law requires.
Deputy Attorney General Brian Ragunan said in a court filing
that “it would be impossible to hold a special primary election at
this juncture without violating other mandatory provisions of Title
19.” Ragunan opposes the special primary plan.
He said special elections “must be conducted in the same manner
as primary and general elections.”
Ragunan maintains “there is no statutory authority… to hold a
special primary election as a result of a voided primary
election.”
Still, the New Jersey Globe has learned that at least half the
members of the Union County Board of Elections were not consulted
by Ragunan, their attorney, before his submission of his court
filing yesterday afternoon. It’s not clear if the state
attorney general’s office was authorized to take any position at
all.
Maximilian J. Ranzato, who represents Wilkerson, wants a new
election.
While the statutes do not expressly provide a mechanism for this
precise situation, that absence cannot be the basis for
disenfranchising the voters of Roselle,” he said in a legal filing
today. “The court has both the authority and the responsibility to
ensure that the people themselves, not party committees or
procedural happenstance, determine who represents them.”
But Johnson’s attorney, Alyssa Duffy Zara, argued that New
Jersey has no statute for holding special primary and special
general elections for municipal office.
“Absent clear legislative guidance, (Bergen and Wilkerson)
cannot unilaterally create their own form of relief,” Zara said.
“The process failed to produce a Democratic nominee due to voter
disenfranchisement. To now deprive the Democratic Party of the
opportunity to select a nominee for the general election would
frustrate the purpose of the primary and run counter to the
legislative intent.”
Deitch said he’s open to reconsidering his decision to order a
new primary.
“If the court was in error, the court would have no problem
altering its decision,” he sta
A lawyer representing the Roselle Democratic County Committee,
Timothy Howes, told Deitch on Thursday that he will not attend
today’s court hearing and that local Democrats are preparing to
select a nominee. If that candidate – likely to be Johnson – is not
accepted, Howes hinted that another lawsuit is forthcoming.
On Thursday, Wilkerson emailed a statement from Roselle Mayor
Donald Shaw alleging that the Democratic municipal chairman,
Assemblyman Reginald Atkins (D-Roselle), was trying to force his
preferred candidate.
“Reginald Atkins is trying to silence Roselle voters by asking a
judge to hand him the power to appoint his own hand-picked
candidate to the at-large council seat,” said Shaw. “This is
nothing less than an attempt to take away the people’s right to
vote.”
This afternoon, Deitch has scheduled a hearing on a petition
challenge in Hillside that languished in his
docket for more than a week.
The post Decision on disputed Roselle election expected
today appeared first on New Jersey
Globe.
