Julio 03, 2026

Noticias

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

New Jerseyans aren’t always civil, but it’s still possible for a liberal Democrat and a conservative Republican to have a rational and pleasant conversation about politics in the state. Dan Bryan is a former senior advisor to Gov. Phil Murphy and is now the owner of his own public affairs firm, and Alex Wilkes is an attorney and former executive director of America Rising PAC who advises Republican candidates in New Jersey and across the nation, including the New Jersey GOP. Dan and Alex are both experienced strategists who are currently in the room where high-level decisions are made. They will get together weekly with New Jersey Globe editor David Wildstein – or, this week, with New Jersey Globe Washington reporter Joey Fox – to discuss politics and issues.

New Jersey Globe: Charlie Kirk’s shocking assassination last week was the latest in a long line of attacks on politicians and public figures like Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and, a few years ago, New Jersey federal judge Esther Salas. People consistently say in the wake of these attacks that we need to turn down the temperature of politics and remember the humanity of the other side – but what does that look like in practice? How, in an era when both parties see the other as an existential threat, do we put political violence clearly out of bounds?

Dan Bryan: Charlie Kirk’s murder was a heartbreaking tragedy. Seeing pictures of Kirk with his young daughters, now growing up without a father, broke my heart. I can only imagine the suffering of his family and friends over these past few days, and my thoughts and prayers are with them as they grieve.

Let’s start here: social media is divisive and cancerous. I’m prone to endless doomscrolling at a time like this, and I was again reminded what a cesspool X and Facebook have become. The hottest, most divisive takes are promoted to all, while cool-headed reasonable voices are suppressed. Multiple people went through hell as the internet’s suspect of the moment, ruining their lives and terrifying their unsuspecting families. Social media was supposed to bring us closer together; instead, it’s tearing apart the fabric of our shared society.

Here’s a tip on how to spot bad actors, by the way: they used terms like “they” to assign blame for Kirk’s murder to a broad group of people, rather than waiting to see what the facts of the situation were. These are people that benefit directly from inciting division and anger. Unfortunately, we saw our President do the same thing.

We cannot hate our opponents more than we value who we are as Americans, living in a free and democratic society. We simply can’t. We won’t continue to function. That doesn’t mean both sides share blame equally, and it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t stand up for what we believe in. But if we continue to allow ourselves to be divided by those profiting off of it (and that list is long), we’ll continue down the dark path we’re on today.

As Americans, we still have one ultimate tool for reform: the ballot box. Stop voting for candidates that promote hate, divisiveness, and anger. Stop rewarding those that see their fellow human beings (all of them) as anything less than they are. Start rewarding politicians that know how to disagree respectfully and fight for their principles in a way that is constructive rather than destructive.

And more than anything else, let’s all stop rotting our brains on social media and cable news channels. Let’s recalibrate our news consumption away from endless grandstanding and toxic punditry. Let’s reward constructive conversations and those of us that bring us together with a message of unity.

Alex Wilkes: For me, the 24th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks served as a grim reminder not only of the unthinkable loss of life our country suffered that day, but also of the beginning of a dark turn for our country. Speaking from the viewpoint of a millennial, that day shattered our innocence at a formative age and then was followed by a series of other mind-bending events: two deadly wars that defined and forever changed a generation; a financial crisis that shattered the fortunes of ordinary Americans; toxic, increasingly divisive elections from 2012 forward; school shootings that are more gruesome than the last; a global pandemic paired with lockdown measures that are proving to be deadlier than the virus itself; a massacre of Jews on October 7th, and two assassination attempts on a former President in the 2024 election.

I say all of that because as angry as our country is, we are also exhausted and weary. When friends texted me that Charlie Kirk had been shot, I immediately – like everyone else – took to X to find out any information I could, praying that reports had been incorrect or overstated. Instead, I saw videos that I wish I could obliterate from my memory: a close up view of a jugular shot that took away Charlie’s most “dangerous” asset – his voice.

I shared meals with Charlie when I worked in youth politics in D.C. He was someone with whom I had once exchanged nervous small talk behind stage before we both prepared to speak at the RNC Convention in 2016. The proper response to watching a video of him being murdered – even if I didn’t know him – is to vomit or scream. Instead, I felt numb, feeding my children dinner, privately mourning for the parents who had lost a son and the wife and children who would never again have a meal with him. It felt like a far cry from the endless tears I shed after Sandy Hook or even 9/11 itself. I don’t think that’s a result of me getting older, but rather of the cumulative stress of the massive social unrest we have endured for a quarter of a century. 

Still, as we approach our country’s 250th anniversary, my heart is still hopeful for Ronald Reagan’s vision of America as the exceptional Shining City on the Hill. I think that’s what Charlie would’ve believed as well.

We do need to find a way to bring our country back to a more peaceful place. I don’t think there’s one policy prescription that gets us there, but I do know that we don’t solve this by marginalizing the role of faith and families in our lives. America is – and should always be – a safe haven for people who want neither, but I don’t think it’s debatable that when society has something bigger than themselves to believe in and strong family units, you see less mental illness, less crime, greater wealth, and less stratification among social classes. 

Our Republic has endured horrible chasms and tragic events (albeit without the added stressors of 4K video and 24/7 news) before. Have faith: there is still hope for America yet. 

State senator Doug Steinhardt says he’ll be introducing a bill to classify political violence as a hate crime. Do you think he’s on the right track? Beyond obvious things like increased security measures, what role can New Jersey play in combating violence like this?

Alex: I think 3 things:

1. I have great respect for Senator Steinhardt.
2. I have a deep distrust of hate laws meant to criminalize bad thoughts instead of bad acts.
3. BUT, to the extent the existing laws do not reflect my values and have no chance of being repealed, I offer a tepid endorsement of this addition.

I’m also not one to advocate for spending more taxpayer dollars, but to ensure the preservation of democracy in our state during these trying times, I think enhanced state police protection of high profile political figures – particularly those that receive credible threats of imminent harm – should be considered.

Dan: I share Alex’s healthy skepticism here.

I think Senator Steinhart’s efforts to fight against political violence are commendable, and I hope this is just the beginning of the conversation. But I have a number of honest questions: what problem are we solving with this legislation? Let’s look at the people that commit these heinous crimes. Would mandatory minimums have really acted as a preventative measure with the people that shot at President Trump, attacked Paul Pelosi, killed Charlie Kirk, or killed Melissa Hortman and her husband? They were all clearly mentally ill – it’s hard to believe any of them were weighing the legal consequences of their actions. And for that matter, none of the perpetrators have gotten off lightly, so why are mandatory minimums needed?

I’m not against this, per se. And I’m certainly not an expert in criminal justice. But color me skeptical.

I am really glad Senator Steinhart is engaging in the fight against political violence, and I hope elected officials of both sides come together to see what can be done.

Nadine Menendez, right before getting sentenced to four-and-a-half years in prison yesterday, said that her husband Bob strung her along “like a puppet” during their yearslong corruption scheme. Bob’s lawyers said much the same thing of Nadine during his trial. What do you make of their his-and-hers defense arguments that the other was to blame?

Dan: I hate seeing a love story without a happy ending. It’s especially sad when it’s a couple that shares so many of the same hobbies. If those two crazy kids can’t make it, who can? 

Joking aside, they are both adults, and they both traded on our country’s national security to personally enrich themselves. I’m not surprised that they’re both still trying to avoid responsibility for their actions. I hope they both find peace.

Alex: Just a display of a dysfunctional marriage that went far beyond whose turn it was to take out the trash and revealed the extreme lengths to which narcissists will go to protect themselves.

Side note: thank you to Mr. Wilkes, who always takes out our trash. In return, I promise to never ask him to sell his integrity for a luxury vehicle.

We’re now on Week 15 of the New Jersey governor’s race. Who won the week, Mikie Sherrill or Jack Ciattarelli? (Bonus points if you say anything positive about the other side’s candidate.)

Alex: Jack continues to have a steady drumbeat of good news from polls showing him narrowing the race to low single digits to the announcement of the RGA coming in to spend money on his behalf.

Mikie, on the other hand, is forcing the DNC to spend money they do not have and showing little return for it. Under the right circumstances, the law of diminishing returns definitely applies to Democrats in this state when all the Queen’s horses and all the Queen’s men have trouble putting back together their broken policies again.

The high school overachiever in me can’t resist Joey’s extra credit, so I will say that I was heartened to see Mikie’s condemnation of the political violence that marred our country this week. That feels like a pretty low bar, but I want my points, Joey.

Dan: Since we’ve been off for a few weeks, I’ll go back to the ad releases from earlier this month. This is a paid media campaign from this point on – everything else is window dressing.

Mikie’s ad was a strong, bio-driven ad that touts her agenda for working families in our state. Like her primary ads, it’s clear, focused, and well executed.

Jack’s ad felt tired. Really, another diner ad? It felt like political white noise. And it started on the defensive, trying to inoculate him against his servile stance toward President Trump. He looked great in the ad, and he comes across well. But it didn’t seem to do enough work for him.

But to me, the real news was the IE-promoted negative ad against Jack. It is devastating. We got another example of a Republican candidate making the mistake of being *too* honest about his views on the campaign trail, with Jack Ciattarelli fantasizing about eliminating the income tax and raising sales tax on New Jersey.

His defense is that he was innocently pointing out that Tennessee does it that way, but any honest read of his comments would conclude that he brought Tennessee up as an example of how New Jersey could structure its tax system. It was a big mistake, and it gave the Sherrill team the upper hand on taxes down the stretch.

The post Stomping Grounds: Charlie Kirk, Nadine Menendez, and hate-crime bills appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

Roselle Democrats have chosen Cynthia Johnson as their candidate for an at-large borough council seat, defeating incumbent Denise Wilkerson by a vote of 20-7 in a court-ordered special meeting this evening.

Johnson, a 3rd Ward councilwoman, came within two votes of defeating. Wilkerson in the June Democratic primary.  But Superior Court Judge John Deitch annulled the primary results last week after a three-month legal battle that left both sides critical of the court’s sluggish movement.

With no Republican nominee, Johnson is now unopposed in the general election unless someone mounts a successful write-in campaign.

Wilkerson sought to file an appeal of Deitch’s ruling on Friday afternoon, but the judiciary has not responded to her emails or voicemails.

Deitch issued his order after business hours on Friday, and by then, the Appellate Division was closed.  Deitch had distributed his decision to some parties, but not all, prior to the 4:30 court closing.  The New Jersey Globe first reported Deitch’s ruling at 3:25 PM, and he had publicly announced it before the court closed.

“Within minutes of receiving this decision, (Councilwoman Denise) Wilkerson sought a stay from the trial, which was denied, and filed an application for an emergent appeal and a renewed motion to stay,” said Maximillan J. Ranzato, her attorney, in court documents filed today.

According to court documents, Wilkerson tried to contact the Appellate Division by phone and email, and reached out to the New Jersey State Police to contact a judge on call, but has received no response.

Deitch denied Wilkerson’s request that his ruling be stayed pending an appeal, even though his written decision had not been filed.   In New Jersey, attorney court filings are time-stamped, but decisions and orders from judges carry just the date and not the time.

Deitch has been dealing with the Roselle matter since June, when Wilkerson defeated Johnson in the Democratic primary by three votes.  He initially denied Johnson’s recount application, but the appellate division overturned him.  A recount reduced Wilkerson’s margin to two votes.

Last week, Deitch ordered a do-over primary election after finding at least three voters were inadvertently disenfranchised by poll workers.  But on Friday, Deitch changed his mind after discovering that he had no legal basis to order a new election.  He ordered the local Democratic Party to select a new nominee; in that venue, Johnson is considered the favorite.

One ballot was cast for “I vote for the people.”

The post Democrats pick Johnson in Roselle; Appellate Court still ghosts Wilkerson appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

The New Jersey court’s Appellate Division has not responded to a Roselle councilwoman’s appeal of a decision late Friday that invalidated the results of the June Democratic primary for an at-large borough council seat and ordered the local Democratic party to pick a new candidate today.

Superior Court Judge John Deitch issued his order after business hours on Friday, and by then, the Appellate Division was closed.  Deitch had distributed his decision to some parties, but not all, prior to the 4:30 court closing.  The New Jersey Globe first reported Deitch’s ruling at 3:25 PM, and he had publicly announced it before the court closed.

“Within minutes of receiving this decision, (Councilwoman Denise) Wilkerson sought a stay from the trial, which was denied, and filed an application for an emergent appeal and a renewed motion to stay,” said Maximillan J. Ranzato, her attorney, in court documents filed today.

According to court documents, Wilkerson tried to contact the Appellate Division by phone and email, and reached out to the New Jersey State Police to contact a judge on call, but has received no response.

Deitch denied Wilkerson’s request that his ruling be stayed pending an appeal, even though his written decision had not been filed.   In New Jersey, attorney court filings are time-stamped, but decisions and orders from judges carry just the date and not the time.

Deitch has been dealing with the Roselle matter since June, when Wilkerson defeated challenger Cynthia Johnson in the Democratic primary by three votes.  He initially denied Johnson’s recount application, but the appellate division overturned him.  A recount reduced Wilkerson’s margin to two votes.

Last week, Deitch ordered a do-over primary election after finding at least three voters were inadvertently disenfranchised by poll workers.  But on Friday, Deitch changed his mind after discovering that he had no legal basis to order a new election.  He ordered the local Democratic Party to select a new nominee; in that venue, Johnson is considered the favorite.

The Roselle Democratic County Committee is scheduled to meet at 6 PM tonight to select a general election nominee, and ballots are expected to be printed tomorrow morning.  State law requires election officials to commence mailing vote-by-mail ballots on September 20.

“The primary was in June, and the court process has somehow led to the disenfranchisement of over 3,000 voters,” Ranzato said.  “Wilkerson is uncertain how else she can seek emergent relief when the challenger to the primary will benefit from the court’s decision.”

The post N.J. appellate court ghosting candidate challenge to judge’s 11th hour ruling appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-Montclair), the Democratic nominee for governor, released a platform on improving transparency and accountability in state government on Friday.

The platform, which she announced in Morristown with state Sen. Britnee Timberlake (D-East Orange) and Assembly nominee Chigozie Onyema, largely focuses on increasing transparency surrounding state spending and the budget process. The platform is the latest of several she has released this summer.

“New Jerseyans need to know where their tax dollars are going,” Sherrill said. “They need accountability. They deserve accountability. You shouldn’t have to be a political insider to figure out how the state budget is running or where your money is going.”

New Jersey’s budget process is controversial to many, including many lawmakers. In June, the legislative budget committees met late on a Friday evening to clear the budget from committee, sparking frustration among Republicans and those who had hoped to testify on the bill.

Sherrill’s proposals, like a New Jersey Report Card, would track the budget and spending after they’re approved to ensure accountability. And she said that beyond tracking the money, the Report Card would measure the outcomes of budget items and offer a plain-language version of the budget.

“Agencies will be required to update the Report Card to show when a program receives funding in the budget, begins to operate on the ground, and demonstrates results that matter to families,” the platform states. “You will be able to see who got paid, for what purpose, at what cost, and what results were achieved, which will allow New Jerseyans to hold the state accountable.”

The congresswoman said all state contracts will be posted online in simple terms: the winner of the contract, the cost, and the services the state will receive in return.

Jack Ciattarelli, the Republican nominee for governor, has also proposed reforms to the state budget process. He said he wants a two-week “cooling off period” after a budget bill is introduced to give the public ample time to review spending proposals. He also proposed the creation of an NJ Department of Government Efficiency to weed out unnecessary or wasteful spending.

Sherrill’s platform doesn’t touch on several issues that transparency-focused groups and voters deem vital, including watchdog agencies, the Open Public Records Act, campaign finance, or financial disclosures for state officials.

Sherrill touted her release of tax returns showing the exact values of her holdings (the New Jersey Globe found she had no unusual stock gains while in office). But when asked whether she thought cabinet officials or state legislators should meet that same standard, she didn’t specify any reforms she’d like to see.

“You know, I would like people to have full transparency and accountability, so I’m going to work with the state government to determine what those requirements are at each level of government,” she said.

Transparency advocates in the state have condemned 2024 reforms to the Open Public Records Act, arguing the law’s weakened scope dealt a blow to transparency in the state. Sherrill has criticized some of the reforms, and while the platform does not address OPRA, she said Friday that she opposes the rollbacks.

“This plan actually addresses much of what people OPRA the state for,” she said. “And so I think we both need to have stronger OPRA laws to provide more accountability, but also, by putting this information out, we can continue to drive down the burden on the state of OPRA claims, because we will have so much of this available to the public.”

When asked whether she agrees the state comptroller should be “reined in” after a controversial report about a George Norcross-founded insurance brokerage, Sherrill said she could see a continued role for the comptroller but didn’t specify what that role would be. She didn’t say whether she would keep acting Comptroller Kevin Walsh in his role during a Sherrill administration.

“Look, I’m setting up a new government,” she said. “We’re providing a culture shift and a culture change, but certainly my comptroller is going to make sure to hold people accountable.”

During the event, Sherrill attacked Ciattarelli for not releasing his tax returns; Ciattarelli spokesperson Chris Russell said Ciattarelli is planning to release his tax returns this year and repeated attacks on Sherrill over her stock trades.

“Jack Ciattarelli was the most transparent member of the General Assembly,” Russell said. “He’s released his tax returns before and he’s going to again this year.”

The post Sherrill releases budget-focused transparency proposals appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

A candidate for Hillside Township Council is back on the ballot after her petitions were initially rejected by the municipal clerk, resolving a legal battle that was originally set to take months to resolve.

Sonya McBurrows, an ally of Hillside Mayor Dahlia Vertreese, filed to run for an at-large council seat with 278 signatures, 28 more than the 250 she needed. A complaint was filed by the local Democratic boss, however, and Hillside Municipal Clerk Rayna Harris determined that 37 of McBurrows’s signatures were invalid, thus removing her from the ballot.

McBurrows filed a legal challenge against her removal, and the case was assigned to Superior Court Judge John Deitch. Absurdly, Deitch then scheduled a hearing in the matter for October 3 – two weeks after vote-by-mail ballots have to be sent out. Deitch then moved the hearing forward three weeks to next Monday, September 15, before finally switching it to today.

McBurrows’s attorney, Jason Sena, argued in court today that McBurrows should remain on the ballot for two reasons. For one, he said, McBurrows was never notified of the challenge against her signatures as is required by state law, only learning of it once Harris had already made the decision to remove her from the ballot, a timeline Harris herself corroborated.

“Ignorance of the law is no excuse. It’s the law,” Sena said. “That is a significant due process violation.”

Secondly, Sena said that eleven of the contested signatures should in fact have been allowed to stand. Harris had already conceded that six of the eleven should be counted before the hearing began, and Sena called up testimony related to the remaining five.

In his ruling, Deitch said that while Harris’s failure to alert McBurrows of the challenge violated state law, it didn’t amount to an attack on her due process rights: “While I find that the statute wasn’t complied with, I don’t find that the noncompliance was willful or malicious or somehow designed to prejudice the candidate,” he said. But he also said Sena had successfully convinced the court of many contested signatures’ validity, thus putting McBurrows above the 250-signature threshold and keeping her on the ballot.

The challenge to McBurrows’s signatures was originally filed by Anthony Salters, the chairman of the Hillside Democratic municipal committee who recently served a prison sentence for tax fraud. The local Democratic committee is supporting Councilman Craig Epps for mayor and his rival slate of council candidates in the November 4 nonpartisan election.

McBurrows is running on the Building a Better Hillside ticket with Vetreese, who has been on the outs with local Democratic power brokers for years, and one incumbent at-large councilmember, Robert Rios. Vertreese, an ally of Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, was first elected in 2017 by just 28 votes, and won re-election in 2021 even after the Union County Democratic organization endorsed one of her rivals.

A third mayoral candidate, Councilwoman Andrea Hyatt, is also running with her own slate; her slate only includes two at-large council candidates, so that race is an eight-way contest for three seats.

The post Vertreese ally allowed back on council ballot in Hillside appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Pacifico Comunicaciones

PÁCIFICO COMUNICACIONES con más de 59 años de ministerio radial, difunde espacios culturales, musicales de entrevistas y noticias. Su elaboración y contenido están a cargo de profesionales especializados que nos permiten asegurar una amplia sintonía en todo el Perú.

  +Tel: (511) 7330967 - 7266850  

  +Cel: (+51) 945002522