Julio 04, 2026

Noticias

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

A pair of Democrats joined Planned Parenthood officials outside a clinic in Perth Amboy on Monday to argue last month’s GOP budget bill harms reproductive health care access in the state. 

A provision in President Donald Trump’s so-called Big, Beautiful Bill blocks Medicaid funds from being spent at Planned Parenthood facilities. Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D-Montclair), the Democratic nominee for governor, and Rep. Frank Pallone (D-Long Branch) said the policy will make it harder for New Jerseyans to access vital reproductive care, cancer screenings, and STI testing.

The Trump administration has said “the bill stops federal subsidies for Big Abortion,” though Medicaid funds have not been allowed to cover abortions in nearly half a century. Planned Parenthood has sued the Trump administration over the law, and a federal judge has temporarily blocked the provision from taking effect. The White House has called that ruling “absurd.” New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin joined a lawsuit against the Trump administration in a separate case, arguing the blocked funds exceeded Congress’s authority. 

Pallone said that if the efforts to “defund” Planned Parenthood take effect, clinics could be forced to cut hours, lay off staff, or shut their doors.

“[People] have never been able to use Medicaid for abortions,” Pallone said outside the clinic. “But what this Big, Beautiful Bill does now is to say that you can’t use Medicaid for your basic health care.”

Sherrill, who faces Republican Jack Ciattarelli in November’s general election, said Planned Parenthood facilities in the state saw 123,000 patients, provided 170,000 STI tests, and conducted 13,000 cancer screenings last year.

“One in three of those patients rely on Medicaid, and this care is essential,” she said.

The congresswoman said Planned Parenthood has faced cuts in the state before, under former Gov. Chris Christie, and argued the cuts directly harmed the state’s residents.

“In 2010, Governor Chris Christie defended Planned Parenthood, and STIs went up by nearly 27% over the next five years,” she said. “That’s what we are talking about.”

Alexis McGill Johnson, the president of Planned Parenthood; Dr. Elizabeth Talmont, a provider with Planned Parenthood of Northern, Central, and Southern New Jersey; and Kaitlyn Wojtowicz, the executive director of Planned Parenthood Action Fund of New Jersey, joined the two members of Congress in Perth Amboy. Talmont said the clinic, one of nearly two dozen in the state, offers birth control, cancer screenings, STI tests, and abortion care.

“If those cuts go into effect, we are constantly surveying and assessing where the greatest need is and how we can best address it,” Talmont said. “We certainly value the support of our state partners, but there’s no getting around it.”

The Big, Beautiful Bill, which is expected to knock hundreds of thousands of New Jerseyans off Medicaid or food stamps and decrease taxes for many in the state, has faced universal ire from Democrats since the president signed it a month ago. Sherrill, who might be running the state government at this time next year, said the state could look to fill some of the gaps itself, but hopes the lawsuits are successful. 

“We are seeing attacks [on affordability] across the board, and that’s why it’s going to be so important for an expansive view of state power to step into this breach, while at the same time to continue to fight back against this,” she said. “That’s why I think the court battles are so incredibly important as we’re working here in New Jersey to claw back some of the federal dollars.”

Pallone said that between $3.3 billion in health care cuts and potentially hundreds of millions more in SNAP, the state government won’t be able to make up the difference.

“How is it possible for all levels of government in New Jersey to make up for all these Medicaid health care cuts, nutrition cuts?” Pallone said. “It’s virtually impossible.”

The post Pallone, Sherrill say Planned Parenthood cuts could harm health care access appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

In the race for governor of New Jersey, Democrat Mikie Sherrill has a six-point lead over Republican Jack Ciattarelli, according to a StimSight Research poll conducted for InsiderNJ.

The poll shows Sherril ahead, 48%-42%, among probable voters.

The poll is consistent with one released last week by Fairleigh Dickinson University that had Sherrill up, 45%-47% and the latest data point in a race that is widely viewed as competitive.  The sampling of a Rutgers-Eagleton poll conducted in June, showing Sherrill with a 20-point lead, has been largely debunked.

While the StimSight Research’s Patrick Murray is a veteran pollster, the group that commissioned the survey, InsiderNJ, is owned by Democratic National Committeeman John F.X. Graham, a top fundraiser and bundler for the Sherrill campaign.

More than half of New Jersey voters (54%), said they agree that the Republican Party seems “too concerned with catering to Donald Trump,” with 86% saying Sherrill was most likely to stand up to the president.  By a 59%-15% margin, voters said Ciattarelli was most likely to lower taxes.  The poll did not ask for favorables on Trump and Gov. Phil Murphy.

Sherrill has favorables of 47%-33%, while Ciattarelli is at 43%-39%.  More than one-third of voters (59%) say they would be comfortable with Sherill as governor; 50% indicated they’d be comfortable with Ciattarelli.

The StimSight Research/InsiderNJ poll was conducted July 18-24 with a sample size of 1,108 probable voters and a margin of error of +/- 3/3%.

The post New poll shows a six-point lead for Sherrill in N.J. governor’s race appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

Click herefor a web version of the New Jersey Globe’s July 2025 vote tracker, with links to the bills and votes in question, or scroll to the bottom of this article for a PDF version.

Note: this tracker does not cover votes during the first three days of July, among them the votes on the One Big Beautiful Bill, which were instead combined with the June 2025 vote tracker.

After failing to reach a compromise to confirm more of President Donald Trump’s pending nominees, the Senate departed Washington on Saturday, not to return until early September; the House had already skipped town earlier in July for fear of votes on Jeffrey Epstein.

For New Jerseyans, perhaps the most important vote that happened in the last month came when Emil Bove, a controversial figure in Trump’s Justice Department, was confirmed to a New Jersey-based seat on the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

Two Republicans (Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski) joined every Democrat in opposing Bove’s nomination, but it wasn’t enough to stop him from being approved 50-49. New Jersey’s two senators, Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both voted against Bove and decried Republicans for pushing ahead despite the numerous allegations of misconduct against him. 

“Throughout this process, it became clear that our Republican colleagues had no interest in a thorough or fair examination of [Bove’s] record,” Kim and Booker said in a joint statement after Bove was confirmed. “They repeatedly dismissed credible evidence and even disparaged multiple whistleblowers who risked their professional reputation to come forward with concrete proof of misconduct. An honest evaluation of his record would lead any person to conclude that Emil Bove should be nowhere near the federal bench.”

It wasn’t just Bove’s nomination that Kim and Booker voted against; of the 48 Trump nominees who came before the Senate in July and August, the two Democratic senators both opposed 45 of them. (Kim voted for two nominees and missed one vote; Booker’s voting record was an unbroken string of 48 nays.)

On another key vote, though, the two senators weren’t in accord. A pair of unsuccessful resolutions proposed by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) blocking certain arms sales to Israel split the Democratic caucus in half, with Kim and Booker on opposing sides; Kim supported the resolutions, saying that the weapons the U.S. plans to sell to Israel “would only take us further from the change that is needed and prolong the suffering we witness,” while Booker voted against them.

“It’s time for the conflict in Gaza to end – there must be an immediate ceasefire that stops the fighting, ends the suffering for innocent civilians caught in the crossfire, brings the hostages home, and dramatically increases humanitarian aid,” Booker said in a statement explaining his vote. “These Joint Resolutions of Disapproval would restrict our country’s ability to provide future security guarantees without achieving the goal of ending this war now or increasing vital humanitarian aid.”

Booker and Kim also split on a bipartisan appropriations bill for the Department of Veterans Affairs, with Booker voting no – one of only nine senators to do so – and Kim voting yes. The House has begun passing its own appropriations bills as well, but in much more partisan fashion; the House GOP’s Defense Department appropriations bill passed with zero yes votes from New Jersey Democrats.

Both the Senate and the House passed a controversial bill in July rescinding $9 billion in funding previously approved by Congress for foreign aid programs and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (which funds PBS and NPR); Trump then quickly signed the bill into law. The vote among New Jersey’s members was party-line: the state’s 11 Democratic representatives and senators voted no, while Reps. Tom Kean Jr. (R-Westfield), Chris Smith (R-Manchester), and Jeff Van Drew (R-Dennis) voted yes.

“You can draw a straight line from the mass decline of local media outlets and Americans’ growing national alienation and distrust,” Rep. Nellie Pou (D-North Haledon) said in harsh opposition to the bill. “I view this bill as an attack on democracy itself and strongly oppose it.”

The rescissions bill may have united all Democrats in opposition, but the same was not true of two cryptocurrency-related bills, the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act, that divided the Democratic caucus along unusual lines. 

Reps. Herb Conaway (D-Delran), Josh Gottheimer (D-Tenafly), Rob Menendez (D-Jersey City), Nellie Pou (D-North Haledon), and Mikie Sherrill (D-Montclair) joined the state’s three Republicans in voting to pass both bills, one of which was quickly signed into law. Gottheimer, who helped shepherd the bills through the Financial Services Committee, said that while the bills are imperfect, they provide clearer rules to “crack down on snake oil salesmen, protect investors, and ensure America leads the way, not other nations, in [the cryptocurrency] space.”

Reps. Donald Norcross (D-Camden), Frank Pallone (D-Long Branch), LaMonica McIver (D-Newark), and Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Ewing), meanwhile, voted against them; Watson Coleman echoed many Democrats nervous about Trump’s own cryptocurrency holdings when she said the bills are “a scam to help President Trump cash in on his crypto dealings.”

Lastly, buried in a series of amendment votes to the House’s Defense appropriations bill was an interesting nugget: Van Drew, who has voted for amendments cutting aid to Ukraine in the past, declined to do so again this time around. He told the New Jersey Globe that, with new deals in place and with Trump now in the White House, he feels more comfortable allowing the U.S. to provide some assistance.

“My view of this is the same as it was then. Circumstances have changed,” Van Drew said. “We’ve got a new sheriff in town.”

Click herefor a web version of the vote tracker.

The post How N.J.’s congressional delegation voted in July appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

New Jerseyans aren’t always civil, but it’s still possible for a liberal Democrat and a conservative Republican to have a rational and pleasant conversation about politics in the state. Dan Bryan is a former senior advisor to Gov. Phil Murphy and is now the owner of his own public affairs firm, and Alex Wilkes is an attorney and former executive director of America Rising PAC who advises Republican candidates in New Jersey and across the nation, including the New Jersey GOP. Dan and Alex are both experienced strategists who are currently in the room where high-level decisions are made. They get together weekly with New Jersey Globe editor David Wildstein to discuss politics and issues.

We’re now in Week 8 of the New Jersey Governor’s race.  Who won the week? And I want to ask about Jack Ciattarelli reference that Sherrill’s not a real New Jerseyan because she’s from Virginia.  Is that an issue to voters!

Alex Wilkes: Winner: Jack (loser, the people of New Jersey). Many people are getting their first energy bills with the new rate increases and are rightfully incensed. Mikie came out with some video where wanted to help break this down for all of us, but if you’re explaining, you’re losing.

Re carpetbagging: I crossed the river to get married and raise my family here, so I don’t claim to be the arbiter on who gets to be called authentically “Jersey,” but I don’t think it’s a make-or-break issue. I think it’s very hard to make a straight up carpetbagging charge stick unless there is an especially egregious display of it (e.g. a second home). What I think Jack was referencing was that as a former Virginian, she essentially went “home” as a Member of Congress, and doesn’t really understand the issues facing our state. She has made that clear in nearly every interview she’s given since the start of the campaign. It also raises the question of whether or not Mikie is just using the position as a steppingstone for something bigger: hint, another position that would bring her back to the DMV.

The bigger issue is one of authenticity, and maybe it is because I am not from New Jersey originally that I can detect this: she does not sound like she is from here. Don’t laugh, but when I first started dating my husband, he sounded almost shockingly different to me (and, believe me, now having a wider sample size, he registers on the lower end of the scale). I’m so enmeshed in it all day, every day up here (including my kids now), I barely take note of it. What I do take note of is someone who sounds more like I do and that’s Mikie Sherrill.

Are people going to vote for her based on how she talks? Of course not. Phil Murphy got by for years without anyone really ever knowing what he was saying. I do think, though, that she sounds like she could be from anywhere—and I don’t mean that as a compliment. She sounds like you could put her in Pennsylvania, Virginia, or Ohio and have her run for Governor there. She is the generic “drag and drop” Democratic candidate.

One of the reasons I love New Jersey is because it is such an emotional, nostalgic place with so much heart. Jack exudes that spirit whether he’s in a formal setting or talking to guys sitting in a diner booth. He doesn’t need to plaster on a grin, playing games on the boardwalk with the “common folk.” He’s authentic, and that is what people look for in a business full of phonies.

Dan Bryan: We are starting to see the ramifications of Trump’s tariffs, which are proving to be a drag on the national economy. Job growth stalled, the stock market dipped, and fear of a recession looms. All the while, Jack Ciattarelli can’t find a single thing he disagrees with President Trump on! How’s this one: if the jobs report isn’t good, how about we address the issue, rather than fire the person in charge of statistics?

As for your second question: I was born in New Jersey, raised in New Jersey, married in New Jersey, and my wife and I are raising two kids in New Jersey. Both sides of my extended family are in New Jersey. Both sides of my wife’s family are in New Jersey. I have friends from high school, college, and work that (mostly) live in New Jersey. Suffice to say, I’m all-in on New Jersey.

With all that said, I cannot imagine caring whether a political candidate grew up here or not. There is no data to show that candidates that grew up in New Jersey perform better than candidates from elsewhere, all else being equal. Governor Murphy, who won a historic second term and is leaving behind one of the most consequential legacies in State history, is just the most recent example. But we can point out Governor Corzone, Senator Bradley, Governor Florio, and plenty more. My first boss, Dawn Zimmer, was born and raised in New Hampshire, and later became the first female elected mayor in Hudson County’s history.

The point Ciattarelli is trying to make, of course, is that Congresswoman Sherrill doesn’t *get* New Jersey. But the inverse is clearly true: if Jack Ciattarelli thinks blind obedience to President Trump will get him elected Governor of New Jersey, he clearly doesn’t get the state he’s running in.

Kamala Harris has opted out of the California Governor’s race.  Did she make the right or wrong call?

Dan: It depends on what her motivation is. If it’s a personal decision, then it’s hard to criticize her motivations.

But if it’s strictly a political decision, and she chose not to run in order to run for President again in 2028, I think it’s the wrong call. I’m not sure the party is ready to nominate her again – it feels very much like Democrats are looking for new leadership, whether or not you blame her for her loss in 2024 (I mostly don’t). I don’t think we’ll want a reminder of the Biden era running in 2028.

Running for Governor of California and making a difference at the state level could have allowed her to change her narrative – but now, she’ll still be thought of as the candidate that lost the last time around.

Alex: The right one. She wasn’t ready for primetime last year (not that she ever will be), but this move buys her time – the one resource she was short on last year. She gets time to refine her message (whatever that is) and strategy, all while dodging messy questions, like when the Biden presidency transitioned from Joe to autopen. She’ll get to make some money, lend her name to select causes and candidates, and torture the 2028 Democratic field in the process.

Assistant Essex County Prosecutor Bryashia Atchison was arrested in March for drunk driving after a police officer found her sleeping in a parking lot with her car over the curb.  She admitted she was drinking.  The Prosecutor’s office never disclosed her arrest — and declined to do so initially until the New Jersey Globe prodded them.  What’s the best practice here on transparency?

Alex: Governor Phil Murphy should demand a public explanation from the Essex County Prosecutor, and if he refuses, the State Senate should investigate both the Governor and his appointee.

Dan: Obviously, this should have been disclosed. I won’t speculate on the personal circumstances surrounding what happened, but clearly, there are plenty of questions that need to be answered.

One more question on Bry Atchison: on the video, she’s seen begging the police officers to just let her go home.  She was seeking mercy.  Does that mean she’ll need to show similar compassion to the people she prosecutes — or is this a different set of rules thing?

Dan: I think we can safely chalk up her actions on the scene to the same grave mistake that led to the DUI. Hopefully she’s getting the help she needs, and she turns a corner in her life.

Alex: What we have here are two tragedies: driving while intoxicated, a selfish crime that endangers everyone, and a sad fact about the legal community.

No one feels sorry for lawyers, but most people probably do not know that among all professionals, lawyers routinely top the charts for mental health challenges, substance abuse, and even suicide. It is a very serious problem.

That said, I think it will be difficult for the Prosecutor’s Office to justify that this lawyer belongs in a courtroom while there are pending criminal charges against her. If there are aggravating factors in her case, she could eventually face suspension of her license—or even disbarment. The County Prosecutor owes the public some answers, for sure.

 

The post Stomping Grounds: Governor’s race; Kamala Harris; and Prosecutor Bry Atchison appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Inicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivadoInicio desactivado

Attorney General Matt Platkin announced the appointment of Wayne Mello as the new acting prosecutor of Hudson County, according to a Saturday release.

Mello has served as Hudson County’s first assistant prosecutor since 2016 and will now take over the office’s top role. Esther Suarez, the outgoing prosecutor who has worked in the role since 2015, retired effective Friday.

“As Acting Hudson County Prosecutor, Wayne Mello will bring valuable prosecutorial and leadership experience, institutional knowledge, and continuity,” Platkin said in a release. “Respected by prosecutors and defense attorneys alike, his talent, background, attention to detail, and heartfelt work on behalf of victims make him the right choice to lead the fight for justice for the people of Hudson County.”

Mello will oversee the office’s 70 prosecutors and 100 detectives. He has previously worked in the Morris and Bergen County prosecutor’s offices.

“I am profoundly grateful and honored to be asked by Attorney General Platkin to serve in this position,” Mello said. “I look forward to taking on the challenges of the role and having the opportunity to stand up for victims, pursue justice, to improve public safety, and to ensure the well-being of all Hudson County residents.”

Platkin thanked Suarez, the county’s first Hispanic prosecutor, for her decade leading the office.

“I also want to thank his predecessor, Esther Suarez, for her many years of dedicated public service, during which she built up her office’s investigative, emergency-response, and victim-advocacy capabilities, and worked hard in seeking justice and making Hudson County safer,” Platkin said.

The post Mello appointed acting Hudson County prosecutor appeared first on New Jersey Globe.

Leer más

Pacifico Comunicaciones

PÁCIFICO COMUNICACIONES con más de 59 años de ministerio radial, difunde espacios culturales, musicales de entrevistas y noticias. Su elaboración y contenido están a cargo de profesionales especializados que nos permiten asegurar una amplia sintonía en todo el Perú.

  +Tel: (511) 7330967 - 7266850  

  +Cel: (+51) 945002522